I like talking about space and the future but real life and present day immediate problems beg to lower my gaze back to sinful Earth.
From the special IEEE Spectrum report.
------------------------------------------------
On September 19 2017 as Hurricane Maria started churning through Puerto Rico, engineers of Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) helplessly stared at the computer monitors that displayed real-time conditions on the grid. One after another, transmission lines were failing, and the team hastily
debated their course of action. In this fragile state, the network
wouldn’t be able to absorb an oversupply of power, excess voltages, or
swings in frequency. They could inject test currents into the downed
lines, to see which ones could be restored, or else reduce the level of
electricity being put on the grid, to protect the remaining transmission
system. Hour after hour, the urgency was rising.
By nightfall on the 19th, the crew knew their efforts were futile. Winds topping 280 kilometers per hour had begun toppling
transmission towers, snapping concrete power poles, entangling lines,
and battering power plants. The PREPA engineers at their workstations
watched in dismay as small outages spread and bloomed like a virus.
Finally, at 2 a.m. on 20 September, all went into total
blackout. All of Puerto Rico was now in the dark.
Four hours later, Maria barreled into the island as a Category 4 hurricane. The storm tore a diagonal 160-km-long path
from the island’s southeast to its northwest, demolishing tens of
thousands of homes, washing away roads and bridges, stripping the limbs
from lush green palms, and leaving in its wake a littered and jarringly
lifeless landscape. Unofficial tallies after the storm suggest that about 1,000 people lost their lives.
In the months to come, Puerto Ricans—who are, after all, citizens of the United States, a country of unquestioned technological preeminence—would discover how breakable their modern society actually was.
Water treatment facilities couldn’t provide drinking water, markets and
restaurants couldn’t refrigerate food, banks couldn’t operate ATMs or
conduct transactions. Cellular and Internet access was gone. Street
lights and traffic lights stopped working. Schools, hospitals, and
stores closed indefinitely, factories and businesses shut down.
After the storm cleared step one was to figure out the exact scale of what had happened, all over the island.
The control center was running on a diesel generator, but island-wide
communications were down. That meant the usual way of gauging conditions
on the grid—using automated remote terminal units at substations to
collect and send data to the central supervisory control and data
acquisition (SCADA) system—didn’t work. PREPA’s grid reaches nearly every
home, business, school, and hospital on the main island, as well as on
the smaller islands. For months, the utility was
unable to say just which customers were still in the dark. At first they relied on outage reports coming in via satellite phone and
from amateur radio operators.
Under normal conditions, Puerto Rico’s generating capacity exceeds
5,800 megawatts, but peak demand is only around 3,000 MW. About half of
the electricity comes from PREPA’s 10 oil-fired power plants. Much of
the rest is produced by a pair of natural-gas power plants and a coal
plant. Renewables—including seven solar farms, two wind farms, and seven
hydropower sites—supply just 2.4 percent of generation.
Puerto Rico's grid is lopsided: seventy percent of its power generation is in the south, while 70 percent of power
demand is in the north. This is the biggest problem for PREPA. Hurricane Maria sliced straight through the middle of the vital connections between North and South.
The transmission system consists of 4,000 km of line divided among three
voltages. The backbone is a 230-kilovolt ring around the
island, with two South-North corridors dividing the island into
western, central, and eastern loops. This feeds an extensive 115-kV
network that delivers power to population centers. Finally, a
38-kilovolt “subtransmission” network serves remote areas, as well as islands via underwater cable; it also supplies power to
PREPA’s 51,000 km of distribution line.
Even four months since the hurricane the scenes of destruction were still evident. Steel lattice transmission towers lied in broken piles. High-voltage
wires wraped around treetops. Where there was a wind farm, only
the masts of turbines are sticking out, their blades shorn off, stuck up like fat white
flagpoles. Near the beach town of Humacao, a large solar farm has been
reduced to fields of broken glass and twisted metal.
Blue square tarps
dot the landscape; these temporary roofs are all that shield the
buildings’ occupants from the elements. After the storm, 200,000 Puerto Ricans decamped for the mainland United States in search of jobs, medical care, simply for normal life.
As of late February, the US Army Corps had brought in nearly 1,000
emergency generators. Truck-size 1-MW units went to hospitals and other
critical facilities, while 25-MW units went to damaged power plants. The
unit also received nearly 4,500 km of wire and more than 37,000 wood,
concrete, and galvanized steel poles; another 13,000 poles were slated
to arrive this spring. At first, supplies barely trickled onto the
island, in part because inventories across the United States had been
depleted by the disastrous 2017 hurricane season and wildfires in
California.
Back in January PREPA announced a milestone: One million customers—roughly two-thirds of
its residential, commercial, and industrial users—had their lights back
on. The utility continues to boost generation. Most of that power however is coming from oil-fired units and a natural-gas fired plant. Other sites,
though, sit idle.
If Puerto Rico's grid recovery has been slow and contentious, modernizing the island’s electric system
will likely take many years, billions of dollars, and a lot of creative
thinking.
The restoration of Puerto Rico’s power grid is a timely object lesson on
the vulnerabilities of modern electrical networks and on the emerging
technological options for minimizing those vulnerabilities. Power
experts are now not just repairing Puerto Rico’s grid but doing so with
an eye toward a future that portends storms of increasing intensity and
frequency. Grid operators around the world are considering the merits of
microgrids, utility-scale energy storage, and distributed and renewable
generation. But for Puerto Rican officials trying to rebuild their
shattered electrical infrastructure, these possibilities are of much
more than abstract interest.
There are a number of new ideas, and most share a common theme: a shift away from traditional centralized power plants
and toward more distributed systems. For that to happen, government
agencies have to agree on the plan. Microgrids, for example, still can’t
connect to the main grid. The Puerto Rico Energy Commission is only now
finalizing the rules to allow that to happen. But even the micro-grids are prone to disasters, although damage would be limited.
Here is the solution which could limit the scale of any disaster virtually to a point. Autonomous Mobile Energy System (AMES) can be delivered to any place which urgently needs energy, rapidly deployed and provide an uninterrupted source of clean energy regardless of external conditions 24/7.
In case of disaster the module can be folded back into the transport configuration and withstand hurricane of category 4 and maintain its power ready to start generation again the moment the storm subsides. Ten thousand modules deployed each at the place of energy consumption would not require transmission lines therefore would not be affected by the grid being out. Moreover failure of any one module would not affect any others therefore the damage is minimized to negligible amount.
Such approach is also practically hacker- and terrorist attack-proof - a single module is not an attractive target comparing to the centralized grid or a pipeline.
And additional bonus - it does not require huge investment to start incrementally generate energy and contribute to the global problem.
Sustainable future is in distributed on-site clean energy generation.
Connecting new technologies and future vision in adaptable System Architecture
Showing posts with label Earth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Earth. Show all posts
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Back to Earth: Rebuilding Puerto Rico
Sunday, November 5, 2017
Space Solar - the Future of Energy?
Today, there are many drivers for the development of renewable energy sources, with national defense, rampant
over-population of the planet, quality of life for future generations,
and concern for the environment all near the top of the list. Yet we
seem content to burn the fuels we can gather from our surroundings, much
like our ancestral cave-dwellers did for tens of thousands of years
before “modern” man’s arrival.
There have been substantial efforts to introduce and make wider use of renewable energy, however, according to the International Energy Agency the world's share of renewable energy in 2012 was just 13.2% and according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world's consumption of renewable energy in 2015 dropped to 12.5%. Taking into account that these figures include hydro power, which today makes majority of renewables (but has limited potential for growth) the share of solar energy is estimated at 3% or below.
Sun is the most abundant and unlimited source of energy. With the recent advances in technology and mass production solar approaches, and in some instances have reached parity with the traditional sources. Why don't we use it more widely and eliminate the need for fossil fuels completely? The reason is (and similarly for wind) is in its intermittent and unreliable nature, and their uneven availability across different geographical locations. Previously I have written about the Ascent Mobile Energy System (AMES). The module can be delivered to practically any destination, deployed and produce clean energy in autonomous mode. However, even such an advanced integrated system can be challenged to sustain uninterrupted energy production for extended period of time beyond Arctic Circle or in other locations with extreme environments.
There is a technology however which for a long time has been a subject of science fiction only. It is called Space Solar Power, or SSP. The idea of SSP in theory is simple: harvesting virtually unlimited solar energy with orbiting collectors and beaming it to Earth. Unlike terrestrial solar (or wind), the Space Solar is available any time of the day and year, is not subject to weather conditions or obstacles, and - the most important - has no geographical limitations.
State of technology and humongous cost of its realization, combined with relatively low fuel prices, for a long time hindered its development. Now the technological gap is closing rapidly, and with the growing energy demand and all the challenges meeting it, the cost can be overcome. It became a subject of intense research in recent years and a number of countries have started testing technology in practice.
The US, Japan, and Russia have all made investments in this area, and the space departments of Canada, Europe, and South Korea are also conducting related research.
However it is China who is expected to be the world's first country to build a practical solar power station in space according to Li Ming, a research fellow from China Academy of Space Technology.
China entered the top ranks in research of space solar power after decades of research which has significantly narrowed the gap with other leading countries.
China has undertaken the research of space solar power since 2008, with a number of major breakthroughs in wireless energy transmission achieved. According to Wang Li, another research fellow with the CAST, experts from both home and abroad agree about China's leading role in this field. Apart from the technology, the construction of the space solar-power station also needs huge investment, broad market and support from government, all three factors China can deliver, unlike other countries.
Space solar power will ease environmental and energy pressure on China, and also expected to spur the country's innovation and emerging industries.
(Source: China Daily)
There have been substantial efforts to introduce and make wider use of renewable energy, however, according to the International Energy Agency the world's share of renewable energy in 2012 was just 13.2% and according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world's consumption of renewable energy in 2015 dropped to 12.5%. Taking into account that these figures include hydro power, which today makes majority of renewables (but has limited potential for growth) the share of solar energy is estimated at 3% or below.
Sun is the most abundant and unlimited source of energy. With the recent advances in technology and mass production solar approaches, and in some instances have reached parity with the traditional sources. Why don't we use it more widely and eliminate the need for fossil fuels completely? The reason is (and similarly for wind) is in its intermittent and unreliable nature, and their uneven availability across different geographical locations. Previously I have written about the Ascent Mobile Energy System (AMES). The module can be delivered to practically any destination, deployed and produce clean energy in autonomous mode. However, even such an advanced integrated system can be challenged to sustain uninterrupted energy production for extended period of time beyond Arctic Circle or in other locations with extreme environments.
There is a technology however which for a long time has been a subject of science fiction only. It is called Space Solar Power, or SSP. The idea of SSP in theory is simple: harvesting virtually unlimited solar energy with orbiting collectors and beaming it to Earth. Unlike terrestrial solar (or wind), the Space Solar is available any time of the day and year, is not subject to weather conditions or obstacles, and - the most important - has no geographical limitations.
State of technology and humongous cost of its realization, combined with relatively low fuel prices, for a long time hindered its development. Now the technological gap is closing rapidly, and with the growing energy demand and all the challenges meeting it, the cost can be overcome. It became a subject of intense research in recent years and a number of countries have started testing technology in practice.
The US, Japan, and Russia have all made investments in this area, and the space departments of Canada, Europe, and South Korea are also conducting related research.
However it is China who is expected to be the world's first country to build a practical solar power station in space according to Li Ming, a research fellow from China Academy of Space Technology.
China entered the top ranks in research of space solar power after decades of research which has significantly narrowed the gap with other leading countries.
China has undertaken the research of space solar power since 2008, with a number of major breakthroughs in wireless energy transmission achieved. According to Wang Li, another research fellow with the CAST, experts from both home and abroad agree about China's leading role in this field. Apart from the technology, the construction of the space solar-power station also needs huge investment, broad market and support from government, all three factors China can deliver, unlike other countries.
Space solar power will ease environmental and energy pressure on China, and also expected to spur the country's innovation and emerging industries.
(Source: China Daily)
Friday, April 10, 2015
Wake up Canada, part 4
Lac-Megantic, Calgary, Saskatchewan, Canadian economy dependency on oil, etc, etc.
And now another wake-up call: Toxic fuel spill in English Bay. How many more we need?
Will we finally open our eyes and see that we are committing a collective suicide?
Dear Government, did industry lobbyists bought the future of your children?
At least Provinces appear to be listening - now it is time for actions!
And now another wake-up call: Toxic fuel spill in English Bay. How many more we need?
Will we finally open our eyes and see that we are committing a collective suicide?
Dear Government, did industry lobbyists bought the future of your children?
At least Provinces appear to be listening - now it is time for actions!
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Global Atlas for Renewable Resources
Global Atlas 2.0
IRENA, CENER (Spain), DLR (Germany), Masdar Institute (UAE), NREL (USA) and MINES ParisTech (France) are very pleased to announce the release of Global Atlas 2.0. This new version features maps for solar, wind, geothermal, biofuel and marine energy, and includes new functions and tools such as:
- Map gallery: Search maps by keyword, location or source
- Infopicker: Access data, tools and country profiles from REsource – IRENA’s Knowledge Gateway
- Catalog search: Search for more data by name, location, keyword or data quality (beta)
- Universal data viewer: Solar and wind graphs and charts in one click. Data can be downloaded
- User feedback: report your user experience to IRENA
- Share: share maps and values with your network
The Global Atlas initiative is coordinated by IRENA with support from 67 countries and an international consortium of data and expertise providers.
All existing user profiles and maps in the current platform will remain active in the new application.
Array of IEM© Integrated Energy Modules by Ascent Systems Technologies equipped with irradiation and other sensors collecting real-time environment data will provide pinpoint accurate solar, wind and other resource information complementing or directly contributing to the Global Atlas.
Labels:
Ascent,
ASPA,
biofuel,
Carbon Neutrality,
clean energy,
Climate change,
control,
Earth,
geothermal,
green planet,
map,
PV,
renewable,
smart planet,
solar,
solar thermal,
wave energy,
wind
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Wake up Canada - part 2
Ban Ki-moon, in an exclusive interview with CBC News, says Canada
needs to stop stalling on setting climate change goals, and instead
become "ambitious and visionary."
The UN Secretary General, while acknowledging the Stephen Harper government pledged $300 million dollars to the UN's Green Climate Fund that helps developing countries fight climate change, said there's more to be done by Canada at home.
"It's only natural that Canada as one of the G7 countries should take a leadership role," he said in an interview with CBC News chief correspondent Peter Mansbridge on The National.
Part of that change would involve moving away from a reliance on fossil fuels.
"There are ways to make a transformative change from a fossil fuel-based economy to a climate-resilient economy by investing wisely in renewable energy choices," he said.
According to the recent 2014 Climate Change Performance Index, a report from European groups Climate Action Network Europe and Germanwatch, only Australia rivals Canada in terms of its poor climate change record, among 34 countries analyzed.
Ban said there's additional pressure for Canada to act in the wake of the recent deal between the U.S. and China to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2025.
UN Climate Change Conference talks are ongoing in Lima.
The UN Secretary General, while acknowledging the Stephen Harper government pledged $300 million dollars to the UN's Green Climate Fund that helps developing countries fight climate change, said there's more to be done by Canada at home.
"It's only natural that Canada as one of the G7 countries should take a leadership role," he said in an interview with CBC News chief correspondent Peter Mansbridge on The National.
Part of that change would involve moving away from a reliance on fossil fuels.
"There are ways to make a transformative change from a fossil fuel-based economy to a climate-resilient economy by investing wisely in renewable energy choices," he said.
According to the recent 2014 Climate Change Performance Index, a report from European groups Climate Action Network Europe and Germanwatch, only Australia rivals Canada in terms of its poor climate change record, among 34 countries analyzed.
Ban said there's additional pressure for Canada to act in the wake of the recent deal between the U.S. and China to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2025.
UN Climate Change Conference talks are ongoing in Lima.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Wake up Canada
Canada under pressure after U.D., China agree to curb greenhouse gases
I keep saying that nobody will need Canadian gas and oil by the time they build those pipelines...
There is a better alternative.
Monday, June 9, 2014
Is there a future for Biofuels?
I must admit I have been always skeptical about bio-fuels. Growing corn or sugar cane to make fuel ? It may be "renewable", but it takes the land and resources out of agriculture in the world where hundreds of millions of people are starving. And is it any better than greenhouse gas emitting fossil fuels from oil and gas?
United Nations Energy Future Coalition says cellulosic ethanol is cleaner and does not drive food prices up because it is produced from wood waste or other non-food plants.
A Canadian company, Iogen Corporation, which specializes in industrial enzyme production, is operating a pilot plant in Ottawa and is planning to build a commercial plant in Idaho. Brazil has started construction of a commercial biomass-to-ethanol facility using Iogen's cellulosic bio-fuel technology.
And of course processing waste into bio-fuel works two ways - reducing amount of refuse disposal while providing a relatively inexpensive and less polluting source of energy...
United Nations Energy Future Coalition says cellulosic ethanol is cleaner and does not drive food prices up because it is produced from wood waste or other non-food plants.
A Canadian company, Iogen Corporation, which specializes in industrial enzyme production, is operating a pilot plant in Ottawa and is planning to build a commercial plant in Idaho. Brazil has started construction of a commercial biomass-to-ethanol facility using Iogen's cellulosic bio-fuel technology.
And of course processing waste into bio-fuel works two ways - reducing amount of refuse disposal while providing a relatively inexpensive and less polluting source of energy...
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Energy: Choices we make
“All serious mistakes are made on the day One. Worse yet, you may have to live with them for decades”. This was said about project development, but can also be applied to political decisions and national strategy.
The case in point: Australian National Broadband Network.
Canada (as the rest of the world) is currently at a crossroad in respect to its long-term national energy strategy. What choice will we make? Here are some of the possible options:
--------
Coal
Coal is one of the traditional and still the "cheapest" sources of energy. It is however recognized even by its proponents that its impact on the environment, mostly CO2 emissions, is not something which can be ignored. The so called "clean coal" is only a temporary solution - as its business case based on the purchasing of the recycled CO2 by the oil industry (see Clean Coal - Is It for Real?) - until other alternatives will make it unnecessary and obsolete.
--------
Gas
It seems the world turned 180 degrees since just few years ago since the new reserves and new technologies of extracting oil and natural gas came to light. We seem to forget the concept of the "oil peak" popular a decade ago and tend to ignore now that even with comparatively lower direct CO2 emissions from natural gas there are many other negative factors associated with the oil and natural gas, particularly methane (which has 23 times more greenhouse potential than natural gas itself) and other harmful bi-products. What especially bothers me is that choosing this way will only prolong our addiction to fossil fuels and divert resources and capital from developing real clean alternatives - thus making inevitable migration away from fossil fuels in the future more painful
Safety is an additional - and ever increasing concern. The oil and gas extracted from Northern Alberta or other places has to be delivered to the processing plants and eventually to their end-users. Pipelines are susceptible to leaks and to terrorism. Delivery by train carries an inherent danger which was tragically demonstrated by the derailment and explosion in Lac-Megantic. Also, the risk of spill from tankers, however small it can be, may as it already had in the recent past, have very serious consequences.
----------
Hydro
Electricity produced by hydro plants is generally considered "clean". One of the best examples of it is British Columbia where 90% of electricity is produced by hydro plants. At the same time construction of new large hydroelectric dams, like the one is planned in the Peace River region of British Columbia (Site C dam C dam), is met with increasing and well justified resistance due to the large areas of agricultural and lands with valuable habitat would be lost. An ambitious plan to build a large number of hydro dams in China which is in desperate need of energy while reducing air pollution causes the same concern.
---------------
Nuclear
It is impossible to discuss nuclear energy within few paragraphs without addressing both its high output, nuclear industry reliability track record, but also potential dangers of catastrophic failure and enormous complications related to storing of nuclear waste. I will limit the discussion by one comment only - assuming all hurdles of such endeavor as new nuclear project are overcome, it will take many years and billions of dollars of capital investment to implement such a project.
----------
Wind
Wind turbines are a source of clean energy and become increasingly popular and wide-spread, especially in Europe. The capacity factors and useful service life of industrial wind turbines (IWT) are important determinants of levelized wind energy costs. However, some recent studies have brought to light the capacity factors are less and useful service life is shorter than typically assumed. Based on analyses of actual production results, it appears the capacity factors of wind energy projects in many areas of the world are much less than previously estimated. As a result, the capital costs and environmental impacts of implementation would be much greater. It is typically assumed that the life span of the wind turbine is 25 years. But even 20 years may be too optimistic.
Icing in the Northern and mountainous regions is a factor significantly affecting the turbine's efficiency and is often underestimated.
Because of the moving parts and exposure to the external environment, wearing of equipment require regular maintenance, and more so the longer it is in operation.
---------------------
Geothermal
Geothermal electrical plants is another source of clean energy because it does not require fossil fuels to be burned . A big advantage of the geothermal energy is its reliability and consistency comparing to wind or solar. It has its challenges however.
Open geothermal systems emit air pollutants. This include hydrogen sulfide,
arsenic, and some toxic minerals. Mineral
build-ups are frequently deposited in landfills. Closed loops avoid this
problem.
The equipment and installation are both very expensive. Despite their long-term cost savings, geothermal plants have very high up-front costs. Installation can also be very destructive. It requires significant amount of drilling and digging around. Also, the under surface footprint of a geothermal plant is much larger than its above surface footprint.
----------
Solar
Sun gives energy for life on Earth and is one of the best sources of energy we could think of. It is clean, safe and because we know pattern of its movement across the sky, is also predictable. There are several ways of utilizing solar energy.
Solar Photovoltaic
Solar Updraft Tower
This a concept which utilizes energy of the heated air rising in a very tall pipe with a fans inserted in it, connected to a generator - a sort of vertical wind turbine. Due to its relatively low efficiency and the lack of expertise these kind of systems did not receive wide acceptance in North America.
[to be continued]
The case in point: Australian National Broadband Network.
Canada (as the rest of the world) is currently at a crossroad in respect to its long-term national energy strategy. What choice will we make? Here are some of the possible options:
--------
Coal
Coal is one of the traditional and still the "cheapest" sources of energy. It is however recognized even by its proponents that its impact on the environment, mostly CO2 emissions, is not something which can be ignored. The so called "clean coal" is only a temporary solution - as its business case based on the purchasing of the recycled CO2 by the oil industry (see Clean Coal - Is It for Real?) - until other alternatives will make it unnecessary and obsolete.
--------
Gas
Safety is an additional - and ever increasing concern. The oil and gas extracted from Northern Alberta or other places has to be delivered to the processing plants and eventually to their end-users. Pipelines are susceptible to leaks and to terrorism. Delivery by train carries an inherent danger which was tragically demonstrated by the derailment and explosion in Lac-Megantic. Also, the risk of spill from tankers, however small it can be, may as it already had in the recent past, have very serious consequences.
----------
Hydro
Electricity produced by hydro plants is generally considered "clean". One of the best examples of it is British Columbia where 90% of electricity is produced by hydro plants. At the same time construction of new large hydroelectric dams, like the one is planned in the Peace River region of British Columbia (Site C dam C dam), is met with increasing and well justified resistance due to the large areas of agricultural and lands with valuable habitat would be lost. An ambitious plan to build a large number of hydro dams in China which is in desperate need of energy while reducing air pollution causes the same concern.
---------------
Nuclear
It is impossible to discuss nuclear energy within few paragraphs without addressing both its high output, nuclear industry reliability track record, but also potential dangers of catastrophic failure and enormous complications related to storing of nuclear waste. I will limit the discussion by one comment only - assuming all hurdles of such endeavor as new nuclear project are overcome, it will take many years and billions of dollars of capital investment to implement such a project.
----------
Wind
Wind turbines are a source of clean energy and become increasingly popular and wide-spread, especially in Europe. The capacity factors and useful service life of industrial wind turbines (IWT) are important determinants of levelized wind energy costs. However, some recent studies have brought to light the capacity factors are less and useful service life is shorter than typically assumed. Based on analyses of actual production results, it appears the capacity factors of wind energy projects in many areas of the world are much less than previously estimated. As a result, the capital costs and environmental impacts of implementation would be much greater. It is typically assumed that the life span of the wind turbine is 25 years. But even 20 years may be too optimistic.
The analysis of almost 3000
onshore wind turbines in the UK -
the biggest study of its kind - warns that they will continue to generate
electricity effectively for just 12 to 15 years.
The “load factor” - the efficiency rating of a
turbine based on the percentage of electricity it actually produces compared
with its theoretical maximum - is reduced from 24 per cent in the first 12
months of operation to just 11 per cent after 15 years.Icing in the Northern and mountainous regions is a factor significantly affecting the turbine's efficiency and is often underestimated.
Because of the moving parts and exposure to the external environment, wearing of equipment require regular maintenance, and more so the longer it is in operation.
Transmitting energy from the wind
turbines incurs energy losses, which is a serious addition to other losses when located in remote areas which typically is the case.
Finally, the impact on habitat. In the US alone wind turbines kill more than 14 million birds and 42 million bats a year!
---------------------
Geothermal
Geothermal electrical plants is another source of clean energy because it does not require fossil fuels to be burned . A big advantage of the geothermal energy is its reliability and consistency comparing to wind or solar. It has its challenges however.
The equipment and installation are both very expensive. Despite their long-term cost savings, geothermal plants have very high up-front costs. Installation can also be very destructive. It requires significant amount of drilling and digging around. Also, the under surface footprint of a geothermal plant is much larger than its above surface footprint.
----------
Solar
Sun gives energy for life on Earth and is one of the best sources of energy we could think of. It is clean, safe and because we know pattern of its movement across the sky, is also predictable. There are several ways of utilizing solar energy.
Solar Photovoltaic
More familiar for most people than other solar technologies, photovoltaic (PV) technology originated first in space applications, found ts place in commercial and residential market and are even entering transport - from airplanes to ships (e.g. see Electric Aircraft and Solar Ship).
While their efficiency is still low to compete with any conventional or other alternative sources on a cost basis, solar PV modules have one extremely important advantage - they involve no moving parts, meaning practically no maintenance, and also zero noise.
Despite recent dramatic improvements in efficiency and reduction in costs, solar PV systems have a very long
payback period, which holds their large scale implementation.
Solar Concentrated Plant
These exotic looking installations with thousands of mirrors are popular in Europe, particularly in Spain, and are most efficient in regions with high solar irradiation like in in Africa, or California deserts. They require
large secured unpopulated areas which limits where they can be deployed. Their efficiency can also be seriously reduced when the reflecting surface of the mirrors is damaged by sand storms and other factors.
[to be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















