Here is a very good analysis of the batteries market from Clean Technica.
Interestingly, I just came across of the residential installation using Powersonic 2V AGM sealed batteries - 1300 Ah (20 hr rate). Twelve batteries deliver 31 kWH and provide complete off-grid service combined with the array of 24 Conergy PV modules. These batteries appear to be much better deal than offered by Musk: $206/kWh
(CAD) vs. $350/kWh (US) for Tesla Powerwall or even $250/kWh (US) for the commercial pack.
One important aspect is not usually highlighted in most analyses. Creating on-site energy can not only reduce the load on the grid, but eventually lead to the grid become unnecessary. Autonomous systems will not require power lines, thus avoid losses associated with transmission. They will be protected from disruptions in the centralized grid (either caused by natural disasters, technical glitches or terrorism) and will not impact other individual systems, therefore safer.
Integrated solar thermal system supported by off-grid electrical generation is one of the best options for future clean reliable and safe energy.
Connecting new technologies and future vision in adaptable System Architecture
Friday, May 8, 2015
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
Tesla Powerwall a Breakthrough?
In a Steve Jobs style presentation Elon Musk announced a "revolution" in energy storage - Tesla's Powerwall.
The part about the day-night gap between demand and supply of solar energy is very similar to what I discuss in my presentations. Ascent Systems Technologies addresses it differently however. It uses vacuum tube solar thermal collectors which are more efficient then even the best PV modules, a thermal storage as a battery, and an air-to-water heat pump as a booster. The resulting integrated system is much more cost-effective comparing to a PV-battery system.
There is no
question about the need of efficient, affordable and reliable batteries.
Is his Powerwall a breakthrough? I don't know, time will tell. At least
it is a push.
The following is an extract from Bloomberg:
The new Tesla Powerwall home batteries come in two sizes - 7 and 10 kWh - but the differences extend beyond capacity to the
chemistry of the batteries. The 7kWh version is made for daily use,
while its larger counterpart is only intended to be used as occasional
backup when the electricity goes out. The bigger Tesla battery isn't
designed to go through more than about 50 charging cycles a year...
Here’s where things get interesting. SolarCity, with Musk as its
chairman, has decided not to install the 7kWh Powerwall that’s optimized
for daily use. Bass said that battery "doesn't really make financial
sense"...
But if its sole purpose is to provide backup power to a home, the juice
it offers is but a sip. The model puts out just 2 kilowatts of
continuous power, which could be pretty much maxed out by a single
vacuum cleaner, hair drier, microwave oven or a clothes iron. The
battery isn’t powerful enough to operate a pair of space heaters; an
entire home facing a winter power outage would need much more..
But I would also be interested to know what kind of
battery it is: lithium-ion or some other, Musk didn't mention it in his presentation. What is weight, and what are the dimensions? Do they
require rare elements and their manufacturing is highly energy consuming
as most of them? If yes, then their environmental benefits might be
questionable.
The part about the day-night gap between demand and supply of solar energy is very similar to what I discuss in my presentations. Ascent Systems Technologies addresses it differently however. It uses vacuum tube solar thermal collectors which are more efficient then even the best PV modules, a thermal storage as a battery, and an air-to-water heat pump as a booster. The resulting integrated system is much more cost-effective comparing to a PV-battery system.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)